As I stepped onto a plane to attend the 79th Annual World Health Assembly last week, I learned with a sense of déjà vu that the World Health Organization (WHO) had declared the newest Ebola outbreak a public health emergency of international concern. In Geneva, my conversations with global health leaders gravitated to the most alarming elements of the outbreak: the failure of existing diagnostics to detect the rare ebolavirus strain Bundibugyo, which allowed the outbreak to grow undetected for some time; the lack of a vaccine or specific treatment for Bundibugyo viral disease; and the disarray across global health funding and response mechanisms that has hampered a coordinated response.
The bottom line is we were not ready for this outbreak, and we aren’t ready for the next one. I still remember the panic in the United States and around the world when Ebola emerged in West Africa 2014. National and global health leaders were universally resolved to be more prepared for outbreaks in the future.
At the time, I was a year into my tenure as president of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). I found myself in the office of World Bank president Jim Kim, who encouraged me to lead an evaluation of the global response to Ebola, especially the role of the WHO, and recommend actions to prevent another such crisis in the future. The NAM launched the Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework for the Future, which proposed a collective global investment of $4.5 billion per year to prevent pandemics and the expected economic losses [1]. That investment should support three major priorities: strengthening public health systems, building capacity for global and regional coordination, and accelerating research and development. Chaired by Peter Sands, now Executive Director of the Global Fund to Fights AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, the Commission’s report was truly bold and forward looking for its time, highlighting pandemics as a major threat to the global economy and national security as well as health and humanity.
In the years that followed, the WHO established the Contingency Fund for Emergencies (CFE), creating a pooled-financing facility to provide rapid aid in the face of outbreaks, as well as the Health Emergencies Program to unify emergency resources and better provide rapid response. The U.S. Congress voted to fund the Global Health Security Agenda, which allowed for programs in the DRC and other countries to accelerate their capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to diseases that can threaten the world personally, economically, and politically. Several other critical organizations were chartered, including the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, and – following the COVID pandemic – the Pandemic Fund and Gavi’s Day Zero Response Fund.
Unfortunately, COVID-19 has changed the game in unexpected and very damaging ways. We are contending with new challenges like nationalism, worsening inequities, and mistrust in science and public health institutions. The United States has withdrawn from the WHO and shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development. Across the board, we’ve seen massive cutbacks in official development assistance (ODA) from major countries. The uncertainty in funding, leadership, and coordination for global preparedness is of grave concern.
Last year, as pandemics fell off the political agenda, the G20 High Level Independent Panel – a group of senior economists and health leaders of which I served as co-chair – was reconvened, with the NAM as Secretariat, to recommend actions for the G20 and world leaders. We recommended five specific, practical actions that should be taken by world leaders to avoid the exact crises we are facing today, including investment in domestic resource mobilization and non-ODA financing; medical countermeasures access and surge manufacturing; development bank incentives; tests, treatments, and personal protective equipment; and investment in the Pandemic Fund [2].
Indeed, Ebola is not the only outbreak the world is currently experiencing. The hantavirus outbreak on a cruise ship, though of less pandemic potential than Ebola, is causing significant public anxiety. Both viruses are deadly, and neither has an approved vaccine available, nor a widely available and specific antiviral treatment. Indeed, many world leaders appear to be surprised and unprepared.
But this shouldn’t be a surprise. It is highly predictable that new diseases – like the Andes strain of hantavirus – can and will spill over into people. This is the seventeenth – not the first – outbreak of Ebola in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). We know more outbreaks are inevitable, and risks are increasing. Preparedness isn’t an option; it’s a requirement for our health and for national security.
As of May 24, the current Ebola outbreak is believed to have over 1,000 cases and more than 100 deaths, already far beyond the earliest publicly reported figures from the 2014 West Africa outbreak [3]. In a best-case scenario, the outbreak is likely to spread for months, while partners race to find cases, communicate risks, build community trust, surge tests and supplies, and protect healthcare workers. More likely, it will take much longer. It took nearly 2 years for the 2018 Ebola outbreak in the DRC to conclude, and in that case, because the outbreak was caused by the more common Zaire strain of the virus, a vaccine was available [4].
Organizations like CEPI and Gavi are already scrambling to find, test, and arrange advanced procurement for vaccine candidates. But it’s still a pick-up game. There needs to be a sustained response and financing strategy to ensure the necessary research, incentives, speed, and scale required to stop these types of outbreaks at the source. Despite recent progress and focus on the 100 Days Mission – the world’s plan to have vaccines, tests, and treatments on the shelf for every viral family capable of causing such devastation—the work remains significantly under-powered.
In previous outbreaks, the United States didn’t stay on the sidelines. Instead, we led. America’s unique position in global health security provided many benefits. It allowed us to learn first about how to stop an emerging disease and access countermeasures, and it decreased political and economic instability in fragile states. These things helped Americans, and they are now at risk. Recent actions in United States, particularly the diminishment of the federal public health infrastructure designed to keep Americans safe by monitoring and managing pathogens both here and abroad, are of great concern.
Despite the fear, panic, and enormous economic and social costs of these outbreaks, somehow global political will is still not strong enough to invest fully in preparedness. There is a perplexing pattern of panic followed by neglect to take appropriate action.
The conclusion I heard again and again in Geneva last week was that we are less prepared today for a biological threat that could gravely impact Americans and the world than we were in 2020. U.S. leadership has always been crucial during a global crisis. We need it now more than ever.
The outlook is grim, but failure is not inevitable. We have a playbook for preparedness that can save countless lives and billions of dollars. What we need is the political will to implement it worldwide.
References
- National Academy of Medicine. 2016. The Neglected Dimension of Global Security: A Framework to Counter Infectious Disease Crises. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://www.nationalacademies.org/publications/21891 (accessed May 25, 2026).
- G20 High Level Panel on Financing the Global Commons for Pandemic Preparedness and Response. 2025. Closing the Deal: Financing Our Security Against Pandemic Threats. https://nam.edu/pandemic-financing (accessed May 25, 2026).
- CDC (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2026. Ebola Disease: Current Situation. https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/situation-summary/index.html (accessed May 25, 2026).
- CDC. 2026. Ebola Outbreak History. https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/outbreaks/index.html (accessed May 26, 2026).
We cover Berghain outfits, dresscode, tips for styling, tips and myths for getting in, an outfit checklist, questions at the door, and info on the parties, lineups, and floors.
Discover the dos and don’ts of the Berghain dress code. Get outfit inspiration and insider tips for Berlin’s most exclusive club.
There's no OFFICIAL dresscode for Berghain, and over the years I've seen people wearing all kinds of stuff in there to express themselves and add to the mix.
Discover the ultimate guide to dressing for a night at Berghain, Berlin's iconic club with a renowned door policy. This article breaks down essential fashion tips, from embracing dark colors and minimalism to showcasing your individuality with standout accessories.
Styling tips: How to wear Berghain fashion correctly 💫 A perfect one Berghain outfit comes from finding the right balance between respect for culture, personal expression and practical considerations.
The most popular option for Berghain is combat boots since they are trendy and comfortable, and you can wear them with any outfit, from denim shorts to cargo pants to leather leggings.
Wear black garments or assemble mostly black clothing to match both the dancers and the club environment at Berghain. Deep muted shades are also acceptable choices despite the black wrapper rule.
The “Berghain chic” look is often all black, minimalist, and edgy. It is an effortless blend of streetwear and avant-garde. Chunky boots, harnesses, and leather are commonly seen in line, but the individual pieces don’t mean much if the club-goers vibe doesn’t align with Berghain’s industrial allure.
My newly invigorated TikTok page was filled with “what I wore to get into Berghain” videos, with most people looking like they were straight out of the West Village: slick backs and leather micro shorts.
Discover what to wear to Berghain. Authentic styling tips for the legendary techno club – honest, practical, and without clichés.
What should I wear to a Harry Styles Together, Together concert? Styles already told fans what they should absolutely wear to his concert, and that’s comfortable shoes to dance in all night long.
Last week I got into berghain for the first time since it was my first time visiting Berlin. I just stayed in the line with my mouth shut and I kept having a relaxed and idgaf attitude. At the door there were Mischa and Sven; Mischa asked me how old I was since I look really young. Answered and then Sven nodded his head and they just asked for ID vaccination card and tampon. Note: Italian girl
How to get in to Berghain, the hardest door in Berlin. We photograph dancers as they leave the club and interview them about their outfits.
Want to get into Berghain? Learn insider tips and tricks for impressing Berlin's most formidable bouncers. Learn the best times to go, how to dress, and more.
Wear comfortable shoes to Berghain. Black sneakers or Doc Martens work well. Avoid stilettos and sandals. Choose trainers or platform shoes that allow movement for dancing. Keep your style simple, as bouncers favor minimalistic outfits. Durable footwear ensures you can enjoy your night without discomfort. Avoid wearing heels, as they can be uncomfortable on the club’s industrial floors
Dress Code: What to Wear to Berghain While Berghain doesn’t have an official dress code, there is a clear aesthetic that tends to work best. The golden rule? Dark, minimal, and effortless. • Black is King: The majority of the crowd wears all-black or dark tones. Flashy colors and extravagant outfits are generally frowned upon.
Berghain's global allure attracts visitors to Berlin, further enriching the city's vibrant cultural tapestry. In return, Berlin's ethos of freedom and experimentation provides the perfect backdrop for Berghain's continued evolution and its role as a cultural innovator.
Every true clubber knows that Berghain has one of the strictest door policies in the world. Sometimes even world famous DJs don’t make the cut. When it comes to getting into this club, there are certain unspoken rules that everyone in Berlin knows: wear black, break into small groups and don’t talk in the line.
Discover recipes, home ideas, style inspiration and other ideas to try.
We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.
Your outfit, accessories, and jewelry will make a difference. We cover Berghain outfits, dresscode, tips for styling, tips and myths for getting in, an outfit checklist, questions at the door, and info on the parties, lineups, and floors. We also sell handmade pieces curated specifically to fit the Berghain dresscode.
Berghain Berlin Dress Code At Berghain, you're not limited to just wearing black or strapping on a harness. There's plenty of room for experimental, expressive fashion — all while staying comfortable, because dancing and moving freely is what it’s all about. Elevate your look with a tassel harness, pair it with a bold bodysuit, and top it off with statement accessories to truly stand out.
Is there a dress code to the Berghain? Hey guys, me and a friend will be visiting Berlin for the first time and ofc the Berghain is a must on our check list. We heard there is a dress code. We are both Israelis and here you can pretty much enter clubs dressed however you want, so can someone explain to us what are the exact requirements?
When going to Berghain, wear skinny black jeans paired with a black t-shirt, a black leather jacket, and black boots.
Discover the ultimate guide to dressing for a night at Berghain, Berlin's iconic club with a renowned door policy. This article breaks down essential fashion tips, from embracing dark colors and minimalism to showcasing your individuality with standout accessories. Explore outfit ideas that combine comfort and style, while learning how confidence and attitude play key roles in navigating the
Berghain Outfits 2025 are more than just clothes – they are a statement, an attitude and a key to one of the most exclusive techno cultures in the world. As the most legendary club in Berlin and a global icon of the underground scene, Berghain has been setting the standards for authentic techno fashion for years. In this comprehensive guide you will learn everything about the perfect
Jumpsuits together with rompers make great fashionable and convenient outfit choices for Berghain. People who visit Berghain benefit from flexible garments that offer a range of fashionable styles from everyday to experimental looks. The combination of jumpsuits or rompers with chunky boots creates an attractive edgy outfit. 3. Statement
On those days, I’ll wear something bright—maybe dance half-naked in just underwear and add some playful colors to match the happy, uplifting energy. When the garden is open, I’ll often go for shorts and something light and colorful, which
Strapless black dresses (slip down while dancing), stiletto heels (impractical on concrete floors and for dancing), overly tight corsets (uncomfortable for long hours), velvet clothing (gets sticky when warm), impractical handbags (large or no strap), white or clean sneakers (get scuffed and dirty), non-stretchy skinny jeans (hard to dance in), tight black turtlenecks (classic bisexual berlin wear, but too hot), flowing skirts (trip hazard) In Berlin, a club can be open from Friday evening until Monday morning. But that doesn’t mean that it’s necessarily just one “party”. For Berghain parties, it usually straightforward.
Match it with a dark-colored bandeau or bralette, leather pants, and chunky boots. Accessorize it with a long curly hairstyle, collar necklace, bold makeup, hoop earrings, a bangle, and a small designer handbag.
Your new favorite club fit. With its distinctive silver carabiner closures, this top exudes an industrial charm that's hard to ignore. Pair it with the matching mini length skirt and we promise you won't ever want to wear anything else.
Amazing, wouldn't be my first choice considering the heat lol. was thinking of wearing simple black sport shorts inside — would that be fine, or would it be seen as a fashion faux pas? Also, if the weather is good, is it okay to queue in shorts, or is that something selectors do not like? Dude chill just bring the right vibes, i go with any clothes, sometimes i don’t even change myself after work Emergency black clothing at Berghain.
Your clothing outfit should begin with dark pants such as jeans or trousers. Dark-colored garments suit any occasion because they match the club’s overall style. Avoid light-washed or distressed jeans.
However, a boring outfit is a no-go at Berghain. Many pimp up their style with studded bracelets or leather chains. Black high heels are just as allowed as a subtle fetish look. By the way: Not all guests like it colorless.
How to get in to Berghain, the hardest door in Berlin. We photograph dancers as they leave the club and interview them about their outfits.
The girls who were in looked either almost naked or very influencer/model-looking (these were mostly wearing mini dresses) Quick tip for girls: Dress as glamorous and stylish as you can. I also went to Kitkat, Sisyphos. So fun! Berghain Nightclub Experience: Dress to Impress Tips.
While Ibiza on luxurious, colorful resort wear Berghain prioritizes underground authenticity in dark tones.
100% success 😂 Just wear black and look disinterested. Be grand I don't see any events on RA, where should I look? I'ld love to check it out. They're taking the piss. Matrix is a commercial club in Berlin that looks and sounds horrific. I've never been and never would Oh. Well, thank you for helping me out! Say hi to Sophie for me! ROSALÍA - Berghain
Your ability to meet the enigmatic Berghain Berlin dress code requirements will improve after grasping the true meaning behind its regulations for nightclub entrance. Wear only basic black clothes while you need comfortable walking shoes because
No. A harness is not a ticket. If you own one and like to wear it – good. If not – don’t buy one. Subtle or none for a natural look. Or creatively artistic, if that’s your style. Just not “going-out-like”. Authenticity Check – Outfit vs. Costume The best Berghain outfit?
The girls who were in looked either almost naked or very influencer/model-looking (these were mostly wearing mini dresses) Quick tip for girls: Dress as glamorous and stylish as you can. I also went to Kitkat, Sisyphos. So fun! Berghain Nightclub Experience: Dress to Impress Tips.
The girls who were in looked either almost naked or very influencer/model-looking (these were mostly wearing mini dresses) Quick tip for girls: Dress as glamorous and stylish as you can. I also went to Kitkat, Sisyphos. So fun! Feeling pretty cool in this outfit 😅 #fitcheck #melbourne #melbournefashionfestival #melbournefashion #melbournefashionweek #berghain #style #melbournestyle
The basis: high-quality black trousers - skinny, tapered or cargo, depending on your mood. On top there is a black top (tight, or transparent with mesh inserts), optionally a leather jacket or a techwear jacket.
best advice is go black or go very colorful. no pale tones or anything in the middle, but most importantly u have to feel comfortable in what you are dressing, that’s it. There's no OFFICIAL dresscode for Berghain, and over the years I've
I’ll spare you the generic Berghain and Sven Marquadt introduction here and just say the tattooed doorman has photographed his most recent fahsion campaign. His first since 2014, where his photography was displayed on T-Shirts by Hugo Boss, this time the collection is high tech men’s socks from ITEM m6.
Wearing dark clothing is traditional for Berghain club-goers, especially wearing all-black. Choose a club outfit in dark colors, but one which also showcases your personal style. It’s not a strict rule of the club, but it’s the standard,
Accessorize with statement jewelry, like large earrings or bold necklaces, but keep it minimal to avoid overwhelming the outfit. Wear high-end, sleek ankle boots or designer sneakers. Quality materials elevate the overall look and showcase individual style. These outfit ideas blend comfort
what to wear to berghain
As I stepped onto a plane to attend the 79th Annual World Health Assembly last week, I learned with a sense of déjà vu that the World Health Organization (WHO) had declared the newest Ebola outbreak a public health emergency of international concern. In Geneva, my conversations with global health leaders gravitated to the most alarming elements of the outbreak: the failure of existing diagnostics to detect the rare ebolavirus strain Bundibugyo, which allowed the outbreak to grow undetected for some time; the lack of a vaccine or specific treatment for Bundibugyo viral disease; and the disarray across global health funding and response mechanisms that has hampered a coordinated response.
The bottom line is we were not ready for this outbreak, and we aren’t ready for the next one. I still remember the panic in the United States and around the world when Ebola emerged in West Africa 2014. National and global health leaders were universally resolved to be more prepared for outbreaks in the future.
At the time, I was a year into my tenure as president of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). I found myself in the office of World Bank president Jim Kim, who encouraged me to lead an evaluation of the global response to Ebola, especially the role of the WHO, and recommend actions to prevent another such crisis in the future. The NAM launched the Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework for the Future, which proposed a collective global investment of $4.5 billion per year to prevent pandemics and the expected economic losses [1]. That investment should support three major priorities: strengthening public health systems, building capacity for global and regional coordination, and accelerating research and development. Chaired by Peter Sands, now Executive Director of the Global Fund to Fights AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, the Commission’s report was truly bold and forward looking for its time, highlighting pandemics as a major threat to the global economy and national security as well as health and humanity.
In the years that followed, the WHO established the Contingency Fund for Emergencies (CFE), creating a pooled-financing facility to provide rapid aid in the face of outbreaks, as well as the Health Emergencies Program to unify emergency resources and better provide rapid response. The U.S. Congress voted to fund the Global Health Security Agenda, which allowed for programs in the DRC and other countries to accelerate their capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to diseases that can threaten the world personally, economically, and politically. Several other critical organizations were chartered, including the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, and – following the COVID pandemic – the Pandemic Fund and Gavi’s Day Zero Response Fund.
Unfortunately, COVID-19 has changed the game in unexpected and very damaging ways. We are contending with new challenges like nationalism, worsening inequities, and mistrust in science and public health institutions. The United States has withdrawn from the WHO and shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development. Across the board, we’ve seen massive cutbacks in official development assistance (ODA) from major countries. The uncertainty in funding, leadership, and coordination for global preparedness is of grave concern.
Last year, as pandemics fell off the political agenda, the G20 High Level Independent Panel – a group of senior economists and health leaders of which I served as co-chair – was reconvened, with the NAM as Secretariat, to recommend actions for the G20 and world leaders. We recommended five specific, practical actions that should be taken by world leaders to avoid the exact crises we are facing today, including investment in domestic resource mobilization and non-ODA financing; medical countermeasures access and surge manufacturing; development bank incentives; tests, treatments, and personal protective equipment; and investment in the Pandemic Fund [2].
Indeed, Ebola is not the only outbreak the world is currently experiencing. The hantavirus outbreak on a cruise ship, though of less pandemic potential than Ebola, is causing significant public anxiety. Both viruses are deadly, and neither has an approved vaccine available, nor a widely available and specific antiviral treatment. Indeed, many world leaders appear to be surprised and unprepared.
But this shouldn’t be a surprise. It is highly predictable that new diseases – like the Andes strain of hantavirus – can and will spill over into people. This is the seventeenth – not the first – outbreak of Ebola in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). We know more outbreaks are inevitable, and risks are increasing. Preparedness isn’t an option; it’s a requirement for our health and for national security.
As of May 24, the current Ebola outbreak is believed to have over 1,000 cases and more than 100 deaths, already far beyond the earliest publicly reported figures from the 2014 West Africa outbreak [3]. In a best-case scenario, the outbreak is likely to spread for months, while partners race to find cases, communicate risks, build community trust, surge tests and supplies, and protect healthcare workers. More likely, it will take much longer. It took nearly 2 years for the 2018 Ebola outbreak in the DRC to conclude, and in that case, because the outbreak was caused by the more common Zaire strain of the virus, a vaccine was available [4].
Organizations like CEPI and Gavi are already scrambling to find, test, and arrange advanced procurement for vaccine candidates. But it’s still a pick-up game. There needs to be a sustained response and financing strategy to ensure the necessary research, incentives, speed, and scale required to stop these types of outbreaks at the source. Despite recent progress and focus on the 100 Days Mission – the world’s plan to have vaccines, tests, and treatments on the shelf for every viral family capable of causing such devastation—the work remains significantly under-powered.
In previous outbreaks, the United States didn’t stay on the sidelines. Instead, we led. America’s unique position in global health security provided many benefits. It allowed us to learn first about how to stop an emerging disease and access countermeasures, and it decreased political and economic instability in fragile states. These things helped Americans, and they are now at risk. Recent actions in United States, particularly the diminishment of the federal public health infrastructure designed to keep Americans safe by monitoring and managing pathogens both here and abroad, are of great concern.
Despite the fear, panic, and enormous economic and social costs of these outbreaks, somehow global political will is still not strong enough to invest fully in preparedness. There is a perplexing pattern of panic followed by neglect to take appropriate action.
The conclusion I heard again and again in Geneva last week was that we are less prepared today for a biological threat that could gravely impact Americans and the world than we were in 2020. U.S. leadership has always been crucial during a global crisis. We need it now more than ever.
The outlook is grim, but failure is not inevitable. We have a playbook for preparedness that can save countless lives and billions of dollars. What we need is the political will to implement it worldwide.
References
Dzau, V. J. 2026. Panic, Neglect, Repeat: The 2026 Ebola Outbreak Shows Us We Must Change the Pattern for Global Pandemic Preparedness and Response. NAM Perspectives. Commentary, National Academy of Medicine.
To be assigned.
Victor J. Dzau, MD, is President of the National Academy of Medicine.
None to disclose.
This commentary benefited from the contributions of Elizabeth Cameron, Brown University; and Laura DeStefano and Melissa Laitner, National Academy of Medicine.
DISCLAIMER
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily of the authors’ organizations, the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), or the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies). The paper is intended to help inform and stimulate discussion. It is not a report of the NAM or the National Academies. Copyright by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Related Perspectives